Windows Movie Maker Won't Save

Movies & Sex

Moderators: AArdvark, Ice Cream Jonsey

User avatar
Tdarcos
Posts: 9614
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Contact:

Windows Movie Maker Won't Save

Post by Tdarcos »

I did a video telling my September 11 story. I converted the file - WMM can't read MOV files - then loaded it into Windows Movie Maker and did some editing of the video. I started with an 81 meg, 22 minute video that is cut to about 5 minutes and perhaps 35 meg.

My machine, as I noted in the thread on Starcraft 2, has 1.5 terabytes of disk space remaining. It also has 3 GB of memory. It's a 64-bit processor running 32-bit Windows XP Professional.

Windows Movie Maker can save the to-be-rendered video up to the 15% point, then fails saying it "cannot save the file to the specified location" giving the implication something is missing.

I did the Crepes video you guys sponsored on this machine and I've done others here as well.

I tried it again on a second machine I have on my desk, "CUBE", which is a dual core, 32 bit 3GHZ processor with 512 meg of memory and 67 GB of free disk space. I copied the files over and set it up locally there. I tried saving the rendered movie and it also quits on this machine at 15%.

This is weird as I've never had WMM refuse to save and render the output video. I guess the only thing left to try is to fire up my old HP Pavilion A305W and copy the files there, then try saving. I've not ever had a problem saving a video on that machine.

It's possible that I used a different resolution and WMM can't handle it, except I remember the Crepes video was in HD, so that makes no sense. I looked up on the Internet and the suggestion was to try cutting the video and rendering it in pieces, then bring it back together in WMM and merge the pieces.

I believe there's also an upgrade to WMM and I might see if that's available.
Given the general rise in expenses and fall in the typical standard of living, the future ain't what it used to be.

User avatar
AArdvark
Posts: 18190
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:12 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Post by AArdvark »

What version of movie maker are you using? I ask because I had to revert back to WMM 2.6, as anything later simply locks up my machine. I wonder if it's a Microsoft thing. Actually, all the other video editing programs I tried pretty much sucked out. WMM seems to be the best of a bad lot.


THE
MAYBE IT'S ME
AARDVARK

User avatar
Tdarcos
Posts: 9614
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Contact:

Post by Tdarcos »

I have version 5.1 of Windows Movie Maker, I loaded the program and confirmed.

What I have done is switched to a freeware program called Videopad Video Editor, and it seems to work. I redid my video in HD, didn't have to convert it - Videopad reads MOV files fine - and it's currently creating an AVI, for the 5 minute video the rendering time is 37 minutes. Oh, and the raw 8 minute HD video uses 168 meg of disk space.
Given the general rise in expenses and fall in the typical standard of living, the future ain't what it used to be.

User avatar
Tdarcos
Posts: 9614
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Contact:

Post by Tdarcos »

I was thinking that if I was a professional doing video for a living I'd probably buy Sony Vegas.

Jesus Christ, you'd have to be a professional, Sony Vegas costs $600! I've bought brand new computers and never spent that much!
Given the general rise in expenses and fall in the typical standard of living, the future ain't what it used to be.

User avatar
pinback
Posts: 18055
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
Contact:

Post by pinback »

Tdarcos wrote:Jesus Christ, you'd have to be a professional, Sony Vegas costs $600! I've bought brand new computers and never spent that much!
Sony Vegas is a lot harder to drop, though.
When you need my help because I'm ruining everything, don't look at me.

User avatar
Tdarcos
Posts: 9614
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Contact:

Post by Tdarcos »

Video Pad is 20% done rendering the video, and has bumped up the estimated completion time by another hour and 20 minutes.
Given the general rise in expenses and fall in the typical standard of living, the future ain't what it used to be.

User avatar
Ice Cream Jonsey
Posts: 30453
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Post by Ice Cream Jonsey »

pinback wrote:
Tdarcos wrote:Jesus Christ, you'd have to be a professional, Sony Vegas costs $600! I've bought brand new computers and never spent that much!
Sony Vegas is a lot harder to drop, though.
Ah! Ah ah!
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!

User avatar
Tdarcos
Posts: 9614
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Contact:

Post by Tdarcos »

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:
pinback wrote:
Tdarcos wrote:Jesus Christ, you'd have to be a professional, Sony Vegas costs $600! I've bought brand new computers and never spent that much!
Sony Vegas is a lot harder to drop, though.
Ah! Ah ah!
You know, at first I thought you were making a Vegas joke, because the term for the net a casino makes from what it takes in after paying winners is called the "drop".

Anyway, the new program did okay. I will be posting the video in the "ten years ago" thread.
Given the general rise in expenses and fall in the typical standard of living, the future ain't what it used to be.

Post Reply