Jolt Country

Been meaning to see it since 2001 when it first came out. I definitely would have liked it better in 2001, when it first came out. Takes a long, long, long time to get going but is pretty good once it does. If you like talking. Which I do. But not as much as I used to. i*.

Worst review ever.

Took you two months to read every review ever for comparison?

Jesus, man, at least when I have nothing to say about a movie I talk about the condition of the box it's in or the cover art.

I like this (exciting?) trend of finding old posts that got no play back in their day and are now resurrected in a slightly more tricky form which makes them a little more fun to play. Big fan here.

I'm going to go find some unanswered tech question Pinner posed from March and just PISS ALL OVER IT.

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Jesus, man, at least when I have nothing to say about a movie I talk about the condition of the box it's in or the cover art.

It was a Netflix DVD, so there was no box or cover art. Unlike certain forumgoers, I watch every disc that is mailed to me, instead of mailing them back just so I can piss off my internet friends who want me to see certain movies.

Here:

Unlike the DVDs I used to rent from Blockbuster, it was not all scratched and did not skip wildly when I tried to watch it on my PS2. I think Netflix must have the equivalent of the bowling shoe guy spraying those things down whenever they come back in. That work for you?

HOW MANY STARS MAN

HOW MANY STARS

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:HOW MANY STARS MAN

HOW MANY STARS

My original review gave the movie i* and, while much of the review itself is flawed (although calling that piece of brief nonsense the worst review ever is offensive to all the truly horrible reviews out there), I think giving the film an imaginary number of stars captures my opinion of it perfectly.

Bowling shoe guy gets 5 stars out of 5. Really, the man does good work.

And this thread? NEGATIVE A MILLION STARS!!!

Debaser wrote:And this thread? NEGATIVE A MILLION STARS!!!

=(