Does anyone give a shit about The Matrix: Revolutions?
Moderators: AArdvark, Ice Cream Jonsey
Does anyone give a shit about The Matrix: Revolutions?
The reviews are in: it blows. The backlash of a crowd expecting waay too much, another Reloaded fiasco, or is this a fresh new level of suck? I, for one, am sick of going to see the movies I know will suck, just so I can be in-the-know about how exactly it sucks, just like everyone else who thought it sucked, and am not going to go see this in the theaters.
-
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 6:23 pm
- Location: Milwaukee
Hey, I had a good time just now, although it definitely loses a lot of steam right there at the end. As far as 'Reloaded' goes (which I liked the first time I saw it), I've been hearing a lot of people switch their opinion on it within the last week, saying "uh, yeah, well I saw it again and understood it better this time."
So all I'm saying is, go ahead and tear into Revolutions like you all did for Reloaded, but if I hear any of you going, "dur, uh, I guess it's safe for me to say I like it now," I am seriously going to lose all respect for you as a decent human being.
So all I'm saying is, go ahead and tear into Revolutions like you all did for Reloaded, but if I hear any of you going, "dur, uh, I guess it's safe for me to say I like it now," I am seriously going to lose all respect for you as a decent human being.
I saw Reloaded this past week, and I honestly thought I'd like it, because people are such blockbuster movie snobs, me, included. I actually...hated it. I thought it was horribly acted (my biggest complaint), awkward, bulky, unnecessary in many parts, melodramatic, I hated all the characters and I wanted them to die, and I outright laughed at points. Points where laughs were not the appropriate response. So, I have no hope I'll like the third installment, and will wait for somebody else to rent it when it comes out in a few months before I see it.
-
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 9:42 pm
- Location: R.O.C.
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30451
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
They really should have CGed her ass and boobies onto her horse face.Matedire wrote:I like trinity's ass and boobies
The most uncompelling thing about the second Matrix movie was the two of them having sex. The fuck? Hey, maybe the two directors could show them shopping at the Safeway or picking out a recliner next. Nobody cares about monogamy in movies.
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!
-
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 6:23 pm
- Location: Milwaukee
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 10:20 am
- Location: smacking you like a ketchup bottle
- Contact:
I was going to post the same basic topic on groucho, but haven't gotten around to it.
FWIW, as of yesterday mid-day, I checked Rotten Tomatoes - y'know, that indexes reviews to give a Tomatometer score. My interpretation is that generally, a high score means that most people will enjoy the movie, a low score means that most people won't. It's not really good for saying how much some people will enjoy it.
The Matrix has 86%. OK, that makes sense.
Matrix Reloaded, I was shocked to see, has something like 76%. First off, I can't believe that. Secondly, this is a downside of the thing, it doesn't weigh in just how much a movie is hated, just a good/bad thing. It seems that most people who didn't like it, absolutely hated it (like me.)
Matrix Revolutions - 38%. RT breaks out the "professional" reviewers - a woeful 15% there.
Wow. That's bad.
I had actually heard that this one might be pretty good (despite an appallingly lame trailer), but from the review snippets, it sounds like it's Not To Be.
(OK, just checked RT again. It's dipped slightly to 37% overall, but professional has gone up to 28% - still appallingly bad.)
Oh, and Roody, I (and I think most of us) wanted to love Reloaded. We really did. Hell, I'd like to see Revolutions be a good movie. I still like the original. The fact is, Reloaded is a total and compete piece of dogshit. It'd be sort of like George Lucas following up the original Star Wars with Episode One - only worse. (Yes, Reloaded is clearly worse than Episode One.)
FWIW, as of yesterday mid-day, I checked Rotten Tomatoes - y'know, that indexes reviews to give a Tomatometer score. My interpretation is that generally, a high score means that most people will enjoy the movie, a low score means that most people won't. It's not really good for saying how much some people will enjoy it.
The Matrix has 86%. OK, that makes sense.
Matrix Reloaded, I was shocked to see, has something like 76%. First off, I can't believe that. Secondly, this is a downside of the thing, it doesn't weigh in just how much a movie is hated, just a good/bad thing. It seems that most people who didn't like it, absolutely hated it (like me.)
Matrix Revolutions - 38%. RT breaks out the "professional" reviewers - a woeful 15% there.
Wow. That's bad.
I had actually heard that this one might be pretty good (despite an appallingly lame trailer), but from the review snippets, it sounds like it's Not To Be.
(OK, just checked RT again. It's dipped slightly to 37% overall, but professional has gone up to 28% - still appallingly bad.)
Oh, and Roody, I (and I think most of us) wanted to love Reloaded. We really did. Hell, I'd like to see Revolutions be a good movie. I still like the original. The fact is, Reloaded is a total and compete piece of dogshit. It'd be sort of like George Lucas following up the original Star Wars with Episode One - only worse. (Yes, Reloaded is clearly worse than Episode One.)
-
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 6:23 pm
- Location: Milwaukee
That's funny, because as I watched 'Revolutions,' at one part, I actually thought to myself, now see, this is the kind of 'doesn't that look cool' thing that Episode I and II totally got wrong, not that I think the Star Wars movies just needed to look great. The Matrix series, on the other hand and as I've said before, isn't much more than a cute homage to the dozens of movies it stole this and that. I liked Reloaded as it brought in aspects of Neuromancer and the new one continues that and even extends some of the similarities to Tron.
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 10:20 am
- Location: smacking you like a ketchup bottle
- Contact:
I dunno. Sheerly as an effects feature, I think Reloaded falls totally flat - Neo flying around is just laughably silly, most of the effects are there just to show off (the twins being the most obvious example - they've got a stupid "power" that would never have been thought of except that it's something easily doable with CGI), and the big setpiece (the trucks colliding), I thought, was staggeringly poorly executed.
Since I thought the effects were bad, I was left with the acting and the story - no one will argue that Keanu and Carrie-Anne are both terrible actors (and Carrie's about as sexy as Charlie Brown), and the story was confusing, pretentious, and goes absolutely nowhere - at the end of the movie, everyone's in exactly the same situation as they were at the beginning.
Most insufferable is the "2 k00l 4 U" stuff in the movies. "Neo" being an anagram of "one"... and in the third one, apparently Neo's in limbo, and there's a Mobil station there. Get it? limbo = mobil
DUMB DUMB DUMB
Since I thought the effects were bad, I was left with the acting and the story - no one will argue that Keanu and Carrie-Anne are both terrible actors (and Carrie's about as sexy as Charlie Brown), and the story was confusing, pretentious, and goes absolutely nowhere - at the end of the movie, everyone's in exactly the same situation as they were at the beginning.
Most insufferable is the "2 k00l 4 U" stuff in the movies. "Neo" being an anagram of "one"... and in the third one, apparently Neo's in limbo, and there's a Mobil station there. Get it? limbo = mobil
DUMB DUMB DUMB
-
- Posts: 2258
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 6:23 pm
- Location: Milwaukee
I thought the twins' power was nicely explained and was a fun allusion to the world of "supernatural" activities off-screen.
And I think that Keanu and Carrie-Anne's horrible acting nicely gives the trilogy an allegorical, Joseph-Campbell-concept-of-heroes* feel. Sometimes flaws do fit together in just the right way.
(* - Okay, I admit, my knowledge of Joseph Campbell is mainly derived from George Alec Effinger's The Zork Chronicles)
And I think that Keanu and Carrie-Anne's horrible acting nicely gives the trilogy an allegorical, Joseph-Campbell-concept-of-heroes* feel. Sometimes flaws do fit together in just the right way.
(* - Okay, I admit, my knowledge of Joseph Campbell is mainly derived from George Alec Effinger's The Zork Chronicles)
Right. Since I appear to be the only person on this board who genuinly likes Matrix Reloaded, I'll feild this. I watched Reloaded a couple weeks ago, and now that I've seen it a second time, I must say that I can kinda see what people were talking about when they said it sucked. The three things that really teed me off about it were: 1: the 1000 Agent Smith fight. Why the fuck doesn't he just fly off at the beginning of the fight? Seriously. That goes way, way, waaaaay too long.
2: Tank. The bastards killed off one of the coolest characters in the first movie who made it out alove in a transition. The fuck? Seriously. He deserves more than that, goddamnit. And Link sucks ass. Not that way.
3: The dance/sex scene. I thought this was dumb when I saw the thing in the first place. Seriously. What the fuck is that there for? Words cannot describe how completely pointless I feel that scene is.
But I still find the movie to be a good one, mainly because of the speech with the architect at the end of the movie. Oh, and if they don't explain why Neo can knock out sentinels in the real world, and it better not be some "smith is part of Neo so he has wild and discordant powers TM! Neo rox0rsroflmaowtfusuxwanncybar!1!111!!!" in Revolutions, or else I will go postal.
2: Tank. The bastards killed off one of the coolest characters in the first movie who made it out alove in a transition. The fuck? Seriously. He deserves more than that, goddamnit. And Link sucks ass. Not that way.
3: The dance/sex scene. I thought this was dumb when I saw the thing in the first place. Seriously. What the fuck is that there for? Words cannot describe how completely pointless I feel that scene is.
But I still find the movie to be a good one, mainly because of the speech with the architect at the end of the movie. Oh, and if they don't explain why Neo can knock out sentinels in the real world, and it better not be some "smith is part of Neo so he has wild and discordant powers TM! Neo rox0rsroflmaowtfusuxwanncybar!1!111!!!" in Revolutions, or else I will go postal.
I actually thought that in Episode II, Hayden Christensen worked really well. I once, in high school, dated an overly sensitive, dramatic, emotional jackass; he acted just like that, and he was the type to do exactly what went on in that movie. It worked for me there, but not in TM:Reloaded. I didn't even mind Neo and Trinity's acting so much as I just wanted Morpheus to shut the hell up, and Link and his pouty wife to plot device themselves right off the screen.Roody_Yogurt wrote:And I think that Keanu and Carrie-Anne's horrible acting nicely gives the trilogy an allegorical, Joseph-Campbell-concept-of-heroes* feel. Sometimes flaws do fit together in just the right way.
- AArdvark
- Posts: 18189
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:12 pm
- Location: Rochester, NY
The first Matrix had the "Wow! Look what they are doing with the special effects" thing going for it. when I saw the first Freeze in the air during a kick and spin the scene around then speed up and zoom in, I thought 'This is gonna be the start of something BIG'.
WRONGO- Bucko. It was good for exactly ONE movie. Then it got tiresome and kinda lame. now when I go see M3, (prolly this weekend) I expect to see senseless fighting, too much plot explanation, so-so acting and a soundtrack that is TOO FUCKING LOUD!
At least I will have some kind of closure on the whole matrix thing. Unlwess it goes into movie 4 like I have heard rumored.
THE
WHOLE BALL OF WAX
AARDVARK
WRONGO- Bucko. It was good for exactly ONE movie. Then it got tiresome and kinda lame. now when I go see M3, (prolly this weekend) I expect to see senseless fighting, too much plot explanation, so-so acting and a soundtrack that is TOO FUCKING LOUD!
At least I will have some kind of closure on the whole matrix thing. Unlwess it goes into movie 4 like I have heard rumored.
THE
WHOLE BALL OF WAX
AARDVARK
-
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 4:03 pm
- Location: Scotland, Bonnie
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 10:20 am
- Location: smacking you like a ketchup bottle
- Contact:
Anyone want to explain why people have no hesitation in going to see a movie that they fully expect to be bad, but trepidation and nervousness at seeing a movie that they expect to be good?
'Vark, "The Eye" is playing at the Little this weekend. They need your money more than the Matrix people do. DO THE RIGHT THING.
(Unless you don't like ghost stories, in which case, don't. Unless you went to see Sixth Sense, in which case, go anyways.)
There's also the Coen Bros' latest, Intolerable Cruelty, there's Kill Bill if you haven't seen it yet, and supposedly School of Rock is good although the trailers make it look wretched. I think Lost in Translation is also still playing at the Little.
Movie fans everywhere are counting on you! Don't be a sheep and go see the known-bad movie just because you feel obligated to! Strike a blow against mindless, bloated, pointless CGI-fests!
Lysander: Architect speech, possible worst part of movie. Pointless, stupid, and and TVs full of "alternate" Neos are laughable. The perfect example of the movie taking itself way, way, way too seriously. You are on the right track with your complaints about the movie, though... just follow them through to the logical conclusion: it sucks.
'Vark, "The Eye" is playing at the Little this weekend. They need your money more than the Matrix people do. DO THE RIGHT THING.
(Unless you don't like ghost stories, in which case, don't. Unless you went to see Sixth Sense, in which case, go anyways.)
There's also the Coen Bros' latest, Intolerable Cruelty, there's Kill Bill if you haven't seen it yet, and supposedly School of Rock is good although the trailers make it look wretched. I think Lost in Translation is also still playing at the Little.
Movie fans everywhere are counting on you! Don't be a sheep and go see the known-bad movie just because you feel obligated to! Strike a blow against mindless, bloated, pointless CGI-fests!
Lysander: Architect speech, possible worst part of movie. Pointless, stupid, and and TVs full of "alternate" Neos are laughable. The perfect example of the movie taking itself way, way, way too seriously. You are on the right track with your complaints about the movie, though... just follow them through to the logical conclusion: it sucks.