Which movie is best?
Moderators: AArdvark, Ice Cream Jonsey
- AArdvark
- Posts: 18190
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:12 pm
- Location: Rochester, NY
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30453
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
What's this? ANOTHER person agreeing with me in this thread?? Vark, that was a fine post, with a fine sentiment and quality of argument. I also didn't like them calling the ship's doctor "Mother." It was good of you to bring it up, but more... it was good of you to let ME know that I am saying agreeable things here.
Vark, what's the ONE character, image, line of dialogue or scene from Blade Runner that speaks to you, man? If someone forced you to pick one thing, I mean.
Vark, what's the ONE character, image, line of dialogue or scene from Blade Runner that speaks to you, man? If someone forced you to pick one thing, I mean.
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!
- pinback
- Posts: 18055
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- pinback
- Posts: 18055
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
- Flack
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:02 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
- Contact:
I haven't seen Alien or Aliens since middle school. Hell, it's been so long that I don't even remember which one is which. I've seen Blade Runner many times.
I am trying to listen to this Metallica / Lou Reed album for the first time right now so they all seem like fuckin' masterpieces at the moment.
I am trying to listen to this Metallica / Lou Reed album for the first time right now so they all seem like fuckin' masterpieces at the moment.
"I failed a savings throw and now I am back."
- RetroRomper
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:35 am
- Location: Someplace happy.
- AArdvark
- Posts: 18190
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:12 pm
- Location: Rochester, NY
Blade Runner...
It's one of the movies that I have never seen the whole thing in it's entirety. Funny how that happens with some movies.
I read 'Electric Sheep* ' way before I realized that the movie was based on it. Never made the connection until I saw Phil Dick's name in the credits. I never thought of the story as cinema noir (or whatever bleak future movie genre is called)
The parts that I did see were pretty good. I couldn't identify with any of the characters but Wrigley Scott did a workmans' job of putting his vision on the screen.
THE
PARTIAL GLIMPSE
AARDVARK
(*I'm being too lazy to write out the whole title)
It's one of the movies that I have never seen the whole thing in it's entirety. Funny how that happens with some movies.
I read 'Electric Sheep* ' way before I realized that the movie was based on it. Never made the connection until I saw Phil Dick's name in the credits. I never thought of the story as cinema noir (or whatever bleak future movie genre is called)
The parts that I did see were pretty good. I couldn't identify with any of the characters but Wrigley Scott did a workmans' job of putting his vision on the screen.
THE
PARTIAL GLIMPSE
AARDVARK
(*I'm being too lazy to write out the whole title)
Last edited by AArdvark on Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tdarcos
- Posts: 9614
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
- Location: Arlington, Virginia
- Contact:
"Some of you may have seen a movie called The Matrix, in which the main character, Neo, isn't sure if things around him are real, or if they are simulated and that the world is just a figment of his imagination. They do the same thing to Arnold Schwartzenegger in a movie called Total Recall. And to Tom Cruise in a really strange movie called Vanilla Sky. They all wonder if what is happening to them is real."Bugs wrote:Shit, I might have meant Vanilla Sky. They're basically the same movie anyway.
- Supervisor 246, in Paul Robinson's Instrument of God.
Given the general rise in expenses and fall in the typical standard of living, the future ain't what it used to be.
- pinback
- Posts: 18055
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
Two reasons, one minor, one huge:RetroRomper wrote:I want to hear Pinback tell us why the narration in Blade Runner was a mistake and turned the movie into a complete travesty.
(the "final cut" was in general, a better film regardless of the narration).
MINOR REASON: Throughout the movie, it is unnecessary, and destroys the film's poetry. It's like, you have a masterful painting, and you just want it to wash over you, but there's this annoying little midget standing in front of it going OKAY LIKE, OVER HERE, THAT YELLOW SIGNIFIES SADNESS? I READ THAT IN A BOOK SO IT'S TOTALLY TRUE YOU GUYS. Shut up. SHUT UP.
HUGE REASON: If there's a VOICEOVER, it means there's going to be a HAPPY ENDING, because the VOICEOVER is going to VOICE-OVER the HAPPY ENDING. I think we can all agree that the HAPPY ENDING is the worst thing to ever be done to a movie by anyone not named George Lucas. And the VOICEOVER is part of it. So, guilt by motherfucking association.
When you need my help because I'm ruining everything, don't look at me.
I vaguely remember the ending to the 1986 version: do they just cut out after he kills the replicants? (I mean the, "like tears in the rain" line). The main draw for me though, was that they finally included the Unicorn scene so the few vocal, fans who constantly asked for it, would be silenced.
The scene works too... And it's always nice to see allusions to the original story that don't detract or seem out of place.
The scene works too... And it's always nice to see allusions to the original story that don't detract or seem out of place.
The proper term is dystopia I believe (idealized yet obviously fractured and broken world / society). And the movie actually makes a few allusions to the story: there is a street bazaar / merchants row of animals, the darkened sky suggests a polluted and dying environment, and it is stated bluntly that an owl in the film is "of course not real."AArdvark wrote:I read 'Electric Sheep* ' way before I realized that the movie was based on it. Never made the connection until I saw Phil Dick's name in the credits. I never thought of the story as cinema noir (or whatever bleak future movie genre is called
Normally, such references outside of the scope of the plot are hokey, campy and don't fit very well but here they are just minor nods to the greater world the singular story of this Blade Runner inhabits (as is the off world nature of the replicants and the fact earth feels isolated, or at least disconnected).
- pinback
- Posts: 18055
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
I don't know what "1986 version" you're talking about -- the only 1986 version is the US Theatrical version edited for TV.RetroR wrote:I vaguely remember the ending to the 1986 version: do they just cut out after he kills the replicants?
The US Theatrical version ended with the aforementioned HAPPY ENDING.
All other versions end with Deckard picking up the paper unicorn, nodding, crushing it like a beer can, and getting the fuck out of his apartment.
When you need my help because I'm ruining everything, don't look at me.
- RetroRomper
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:35 am
- Location: Someplace happy.
- pinback
- Posts: 18055
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
Deckard and Rachel flying through the air, on a bright sunny day, to a backdrop of leftover footage from the opening of The Shining (*), with the voiceover explaining that it turns out Rachel was special and had her four-year-lifespan extended indefinitely so they could all live happily ever after!
(*) True fact!
(*) True fact!
When you need my help because I'm ruining everything, don't look at me.
- RetroRomper
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:35 am
- Location: Someplace happy.
Have we agreed that Blade Runner is the best Ridley Scott film?
Does the lack of enthusiasm in this thread for Alien, preclude excitement for his new foray into the story behind the xenomorphs and "old ones" (or whatever the giant, alien race that appeared for five minutes in the original were called)?
Does the lack of enthusiasm in this thread for Alien, preclude excitement for his new foray into the story behind the xenomorphs and "old ones" (or whatever the giant, alien race that appeared for five minutes in the original were called)?
- pinback
- Posts: 18055
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact:
No. Alien is the best Ridley Scott film.RetroRomper wrote:Have we agreed that Blade Runner is the best Ridley Scott film?
No. The fact that he hasn't made a decent move in thirty years precludes said excitement.Does the lack of enthusiasm in this thread for Alien, preclude excitement for his new foray into the story behind the xenomorphs and "old ones" (or whatever the giant, alien race that appeared for five minutes in the original were called)?
When you need my help because I'm ruining everything, don't look at me.
- Ice Cream Jonsey
- Posts: 30453
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
- pinback
- Posts: 18055
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
- Contact: