Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:NICE! I remembered that a few weeks ago I said I would never ban Tdarcos again. I had e-mailed him that.
I saved your e-mail messages from October 21 and 22. You did not actually say that.
So I can't actually ban him, but we would all enjoy another cooking video from the Maestro.
Should I go over what you said in the other message? In this thread:
http://www.joltcountry.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=9111
In your message of 3 days ago, December 17 at 12:45pm, you called me (1) an abortion; (2) a liar; (3) aspergic; (4) a rapist; (5) impugned my manhood; (6) declared me incompetent in the performance of my profession that I have spent 34 years practicing; and in the message of 12:54pm you subsequently called me (7) human garbage.
Again, I ask you, is it that you're off your medication or just forgetful of the really nasty and hurtful things you say?
I believe I have been polite and calm instead of responding in anger. As I said on Caltrops, I'm keeping my goat. But maybe you forget the nasty and hurtful things you said to me, I didn't. I have a thick skin and I'm a big boy and can take it, but it doesn't mean that when a supposed friend says those things, that it doesn't still hurt.
I'd also like to point out something else which you do not seem to understand. If you had actually read what I had to say in the links I gave, all I do is explain how to give a woman an orgasm. That does not mean I claim to be the world's greatest lover, all it means is I'm competent in bed. Competent to do what is necessary, not some fantastic sexual wizard.
If I can provide a solution to someone's computer problem I'm at least adequate. If it works and is a reasonable solution, and it's repeatable, it means I'm competent. If it's really good, someone may decide that it goes beyond that.
But all I've ever tried to do in the examples I give is provide a competent solution based on the fact that the published literature tells me that for a lot of men, their performance with women falls into the 'subpar' to 'substandard' class, and they often don't even rise to the level of 'adequate.'
As far back as the 1970s, Shere Hite did a survey and 30% of women said they don't orgasm as a result of vaginal intercourse. My late friend Andrea told me that girlfriends of hers that she spoke to confirm this, only about half came as a result of their boyfriends having sex with them.
All I'm trying to do is offer to other guys who think they could do better, some tips I've either read, or in this case, discovered by actual use on multiple women, that they do the job and that I am at least competent to tell others how to do them, because when I've done them they do work. That's all.
[quote="Ice Cream Jonsey"]NICE! I remembered that a few weeks ago I said I would never ban Tdarcos again. I had e-mailed him that. [/quote]
I saved your e-mail messages from October 21 and 22. You did not actually say that.
[quote]So I can't actually ban him, but we would all enjoy another cooking video from the Maestro.[/quote]
Should I go over what you said in the other message? In this thread: http://www.joltcountry.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=9111
In your message of 3 days ago, December 17 at 12:45pm, you called me (1) an abortion; (2) a liar; (3) aspergic; (4) a rapist; (5) impugned my manhood; (6) declared me incompetent in the performance of my profession that I have spent 34 years practicing; and in the message of 12:54pm you subsequently called me (7) human garbage.
Again, I ask you, is it that you're off your medication or just forgetful of the really nasty and hurtful things you say?
I believe I have been polite and calm instead of responding in anger. As I said on Caltrops, I'm keeping my goat. But maybe you forget the nasty and hurtful things you said to me, I didn't. I have a thick skin and I'm a big boy and can take it, but it doesn't mean that when a supposed friend says those things, that it doesn't still hurt.
I'd also like to point out something else which you do not seem to understand. If you had actually read what I had to say in the links I gave, all I do is explain how to give a woman an orgasm. That does not mean I claim to be the world's greatest lover, all it means is I'm competent in bed. Competent to do what is necessary, not some fantastic sexual wizard.
If I can provide a solution to someone's computer problem I'm at least adequate. If it works and is a reasonable solution, and it's repeatable, it means I'm competent. If it's really good, someone may decide that it goes beyond that.
But all I've ever tried to do in the examples I give is provide a competent solution based on the fact that the published literature tells me that for a lot of men, their performance with women falls into the 'subpar' to 'substandard' class, and they often don't even rise to the level of 'adequate.'
As far back as the 1970s, Shere Hite did a survey and 30% of women said they don't orgasm as a result of vaginal intercourse. My late friend Andrea told me that girlfriends of hers that she spoke to confirm this, only about half came as a result of their boyfriends having sex with them.
All I'm trying to do is offer to other guys who think they could do better, some tips I've either read, or in this case, discovered by actual use on multiple women, that they do the job and that I am at least competent to tell others how to do them, because when I've done them they do work. That's all.