by Jack Straw » Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:42 pm
Alright, this is just getting ridiculous. Is it because I've grown up playing video games and seen the progression from Atari 2600 to PS3? I can spot that shimmery, ultra-fake looking crap computer graphics in any movie and it always pisses me the hell off.
I am fully aware that you can't recreate all special effects effectively (heh) and that computers have their place in movies.
But every time I see some lazy ass director taking the easy way out, it infuriates me. Just because you CAN make graphics on the computer doesn't mean you SHOULD.
I mean, case in point. War of the Worlds. It had the potential to be a classic even though Tom Cruise has the lead role. I was with it, up until the point they started getting retarded with the computer animation. Sure, animate the big walker things with computers, that far away you can't tell anyway. Up to a point, the computer animation was pretty damn good.
But when you have an extreme close up of Tom pretending to hack away at the leg/arm/extremity of one of the things complete with computer animated sparks you kinda HAVE to say "what the fuck?!?!"
How hard would it have been to have Tom whack at an actual piece of metal ducting or something and have real sparks fly? Most computer animation is done to SAVE money, that had to cost more and looked exponentially cheesier than the real thing. Is this one of his contract clauses or something?
Because to me, it doesn't make sense to pay all that money for Tom Cruise and then make half the scenes look mega lame with computers.
There's no reason they couldn't have done the close-up, human-size aliens "for real". They expect us to pay $15 a ticket to see this mediocrity, don't they?
The real slap in the face was that I watched that piece of crap all the way till the end, when all the carnage was over. They actually used computers to ANIMATE AN INANIMATE OBJECT - a tree just sprouting a fresh bud. Is there a shortage of trees in Hollywood or something? (Unlikely, considering the recent "medical" law changes)
Directed by Steven Spielburg. What a washed up has-been. Isn't that the same guy who made the masterpiece Jurassic Park????!? DId he just decide one day that it wasn't worth the effort to make his movies look real and fuck it, we'll just outsource the special effects to some guy in his mom's basement with a 3d modeling program?
Either he has never played a video game, he is now blind, or he just doesn't give a fuck.
Alright, this is just getting ridiculous. Is it because I've grown up playing video games and seen the progression from Atari 2600 to PS3? I can spot that shimmery, ultra-fake looking crap computer graphics in any movie and it always pisses me the hell off.
I am fully aware that you can't recreate all special effects effectively (heh) and that computers have their place in movies.
But every time I see some lazy ass director taking the easy way out, it infuriates me. Just because you CAN make graphics on the computer doesn't mean you SHOULD.
I mean, case in point. War of the Worlds. It had the potential to be a classic even though Tom Cruise has the lead role. I was with it, up until the point they started getting retarded with the computer animation. Sure, animate the big walker things with computers, that far away you can't tell anyway. Up to a point, the computer animation was pretty damn good.
But when you have an extreme close up of Tom pretending to hack away at the leg/arm/extremity of one of the things complete with computer animated sparks you kinda HAVE to say "what the fuck?!?!"
How hard would it have been to have Tom whack at an actual piece of metal ducting or something and have real sparks fly? Most computer animation is done to SAVE money, that had to cost more and looked exponentially cheesier than the real thing. Is this one of his contract clauses or something?
Because to me, it doesn't make sense to pay all that money for Tom Cruise and then make half the scenes look mega lame with computers.
There's no reason they couldn't have done the close-up, human-size aliens "for real". They expect us to pay $15 a ticket to see this mediocrity, don't they?
The real slap in the face was that I watched that piece of crap all the way till the end, when all the carnage was over. They actually used computers to ANIMATE AN INANIMATE OBJECT - a tree just sprouting a fresh bud. Is there a shortage of trees in Hollywood or something? (Unlikely, considering the recent "medical" law changes)
Directed by Steven Spielburg. What a washed up has-been. Isn't that the same guy who made the masterpiece Jurassic Park????!? DId he just decide one day that it wasn't worth the effort to make his movies look real and fuck it, we'll just outsource the special effects to some guy in his mom's basement with a 3d modeling program?
Either he has never played a video game, he is now blind, or he just doesn't give a fuck.