by AArdvark » Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:12 pm
So no matter how well she races she is still an 'object'. I thought this was the twenty-something century.
law of the Males #14 : Any woman, however good she is at ANYTHING, will be deemed of less quality than a prettier woman.
Besides, agreeing to pose in the previous underwear shot automaticly classes her in the 'skeezler' category. You won't see J. Gordon or JR. doing stuff like that. Just because she has a body shouldn't mean she should flaunt it. Not if she is a professional. I understand she is a racecar driver. Certanly not a model. I feel she degrades herself.
THE
OK SHOWS OVER
GET BACK IN THE CAR
AARDVARK
So no matter how well she races she is still an 'object'. I thought this was the twenty-something century.
law of the Males #14 : Any woman, however good she is at ANYTHING, will be deemed of less quality than a prettier woman.
Besides, agreeing to pose in the previous underwear shot automaticly classes her in the 'skeezler' category. You won't see J. Gordon or JR. doing stuff like that. Just because she has a body shouldn't mean she should flaunt it. Not if she is a professional. I understand she is a racecar driver. Certanly not a model. I feel she degrades herself.
THE
OK SHOWS OVER
GET BACK IN THE CAR
AARDVARK