by chris » Mon Apr 18, 2005 5:34 am
Vitriola wrote:Also, the vast expense of actually going to a movie is what is funding alot of the high-action fx movies, and, although i'll take a good plot with unknown actors anyday, lots of people like explosions and car chases. The minute you can total 87 Peugots on the Autobahn for anything less than it takes a summer blockbuster to make in a month, you might have more movies like that at home, but, explosions need to be seen big to appreciate, and need half your paycheck to be made at all.
I'm not sure I agree with this....seems to me that if a first-run movie were made available at home for, say, $8.95, people who want to see the movie but hate theaters will pony up the cash. Without the costs of making reels upon reels of film, distributing them, and dealing with theaters, they could make just as much money (if not more) than what theaters pull in. It would be interesting to run the numbers and see if it's possible.
As for Pinback, I guess it's a matter of age. Sure, I went to the movies with friends back in the day to have fun, but once you get to a certain age, theaters cease to be a place to socialize....you just go to see the film, and that's it. Maybe I shouldn't have said that theaters will "cease to exist", but they definitely wouldn't be as popular. At least for me, I know full well that if first-run movies were available at home, I'd never go to a theater again (not that I go to them now, but that's not the point).
[quote="Vitriola"]Also, the vast expense of actually going to a movie is what is funding alot of the high-action fx movies, and, although i'll take a good plot with unknown actors anyday, lots of people like explosions and car chases. The minute you can total 87 Peugots on the Autobahn for anything less than it takes a summer blockbuster to make in a month, you might have more movies like that at home, but, explosions need to be seen big to appreciate, and need half your paycheck to be made at all.[/quote]
I'm not sure I agree with this....seems to me that if a first-run movie were made available at home for, say, $8.95, people who want to see the movie but hate theaters will pony up the cash. Without the costs of making reels upon reels of film, distributing them, and dealing with theaters, they could make just as much money (if not more) than what theaters pull in. It would be interesting to run the numbers and see if it's possible.
As for Pinback, I guess it's a matter of age. Sure, I went to the movies with friends back in the day to have fun, but once you get to a certain age, theaters cease to be a place to socialize....you just go to see the film, and that's it. Maybe I shouldn't have said that theaters will "cease to exist", but they definitely wouldn't be as popular. At least for me, I know full well that if first-run movies were available at home, I'd never go to a theater again (not that I go to them now, but that's not the point).