Re: Language Hacking
Posted: Mon May 05, 2025 8:49 am
CO, I am interested in your ongoing job search.
Thank you! It comes down to today actually. Its a weird dynamic between the apparently now demoted "hiring manager" and some apparent misunderstandings about US labor laws (any operating company has to verify employment dates and just employment dates) so its honestly kinda fraught situation. In current job news I just OWNED my new manager by dragging his boss onto a 3 way call to discuss how we can all work together. I'm just glad that I've been around the block enough to know how to block pieces of shit like Stew. We'll see about the new job, that seems sketchy too.
So final reference is checked. Tuesday I either get this job or I keep tormenting my manager.Casual Observer wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:02 pmThank you! It comes down to today actually. Its a weird dynamic between the apparently now demoted "hiring manager" and some apparent misunderstandings about US labor laws (any operating company has to verify employment dates and just employment dates) so its honestly kinda fraught situation. In current job news I just OWNED my new manager by dragging his boss onto a 3 way call to discuss how we can all work together. I'm just glad that I've been around the block enough to know how to block pieces of shit like Stew. We'll see about the new job, that seems sketchy too.
I got the job, for the first time a founder asked me to "please give me a couple of days"Casual Observer wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 2:19 amSo final reference is checked. Tuesday I either get this job or I keep tormenting my manager.Casual Observer wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:02 pmThank you! It comes down to today actually. Its a weird dynamic between the apparently now demoted "hiring manager" and some apparent misunderstandings about US labor laws (any operating company has to verify employment dates and just employment dates) so its honestly kinda fraught situation. In current job news I just OWNED my new manager by dragging his boss onto a 3 way call to discuss how we can all work together. I'm just glad that I've been around the block enough to know how to block pieces of shit like Stew. We'll see about the new job, that seems sketchy too.
Well this one started with making me cold call for 4 - 6 hours for free, setting 2 Sales Qualified Leads, the interview was the easiest part oddly the hardest part was getting someone at Clincapture to verify my employent there, something that is required by US law.Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 7:22 am Nice! Congratulations!
What is an interview like for a person in your profession?
Are you saying an employer is required to verify a prior employee's employment history to a later potential employer? I mean, I can understand most employers do this as a matter of simple courtesy, but I was not aware it was mandated by law.Casual Observer wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 8:00 am the interview was the easiest part oddly the hardest part was getting someone at Clincapture to verify my employent there, something that is required by US law.
Tdarcos wrote: Wed May 14, 2025 1:16 amAre you saying an employer is required to verify a prior employee's employment history to a later potential employer? I mean, I can understand most employers do this as a matter of simple courtesy, but I was not aware it was mandated by law.Casual Observer wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 8:00 amthe interview was the easiest part oddly the hardest part was getting someone at Clincapture to verify my employent there, something that is required by US law.
I believe you have this incorrect. Unless requested by a federal agency, an employer is under no obligation to report any information about current or former employees. In fact, there is certain information you're not allowed to give out to a third party.Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Wed May 14, 2025 7:58 am I am also shocked to hear that it is mandated by law.
Many companies refuse to provide references due to fear of liability, potential defamation lawsuits, and the cost and effort involved. They also face a delicate situation where a positive reference could be misused, while a negative reference could be seen as defamatory. The legal and practical considerations have led many companies to adopt policies against providing references, opting instead for simple verifications of employment.
So glad I closed my Chat Pro account last week, I've resolved long ago never to do business with a company that hires Jony. I already had decided on a better tool and was 100% right about their strategy (they just hired a Head of Applications who will help monitize all the ideas they got from early users) so in fact would never directly pay them a dime unless I had to. Sure GPT is 2 of 6 models Perplexity hits but no way they're paying much in tokens to GPT for my usage so I can live with that.Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Wed May 21, 2025 10:18 am Sorry, CO, the guy who failed upwards and ruined computers just got 6 billion thrown his way by the lowercase-typing scum that stole everyone's content and cries like a bitch about how he HAS to do it or has no company.
Nobody ever gets what they deserve.