No, opinion. It's not objectively provable. Oh, wait, let's do it this way. Please proceed to explain in measurable terms as to why Jack in the Box food 'sucks'. What are your premises for your argument, what are the 'quantifiable facts' that you use for your statement? If it's provable rather than opinion, you'll be able to show them.pinback wrote:No, quantifiable fact.Tdarcos wrote:Your opinion.pinback wrote:1. Jack in the Box SUCKS.
Ben, I believe you've admitted to either being an agnostic or atheist, (If you're not, I apologize I was not trying to malign your faith.) If someone claims there is a God, that's an opinion until they provide objective evidence, e.g. quantifiable facts. So it applies in your case, if you claim their food is inedible or is unpalatable it's basically an opinion until you prove otherwise.
If someone says 'you get up too late' in the day, it's an opinion, they have made a statement which isn't provable or disprovable. If they say 'you're getting up at 5 in the afternoon and you can't get the things you need to do done because it's too late' that's a quantifiable fact, it can be proven or disproven.
Claiming it "sucks" cannot be proven or disproven, as it is an opinion, it is arbitrary. This is simple logic.
Otherwise, show that I'm wrong; present your quantifiable facts to support your argument.