by Ice Cream Jonsey » Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:02 pm
The guy who blasted the Saints and the fans on his way out of New Orleans was Winfred Tubbs, but I can't find a link to his hilarity when he signed with Frisco in '98.
Kyle Turley got fed up with the Saints, surprisingly, after they told him that they weren't going to give into his insane contract demands (he wanted top dollar for a signing bonus when he had yet to actually make a pro bowl), continuing to blast the Saints for several months after signing with the Rams. He was quite happy with being a Ram, at first! And why not? It's not like he said the following in an interview with Dan Patrick or anything while still a Saint:
KT: My thing is this: If they were good all around, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. But that team stunk without Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk. If they didn't have Warner and Faulk, those guys, they would suck. They would suck, man ... and for all those other guys like London Fletcher and Dre' Bly to be talking so much smack about how good they are and this and that, it was ridiculous to me -- I mean, it was like being at San Diego State again. You'd have shootouts, you know. And to go against a team with no defense -- even last year, when they improved their defense, they still weren't that great. ... If they hadn't have talked so much, there wouldn't be a big deal. If they would just admit that the reason why they're so good is because of Warner and Faulk, then I'd be like, OK, that's cool. You guys are humble about being good, you know, and being fortunate enough to have those players on your team. Because without them, they would be nowhere.
DP: You probably have a problem with the guys who aren't the major stars, who do most of the talking, where Warner and Faulk don't say anything.
KT: Exactly. And that's my whole thing. I mean, Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk carried that team on their shoulders, and the rest of those guys just rode their backs and jabbed their jaws the whole way through. And it was ridiculous to me.
Annnnnnnnnd the most hilarious guy who thought that leaving the Saints meant he was "finally going to be able to play his game" was safety Michael Hawthorne.
You don't recognize the name? Well for starters he was the guy on the Packers who gave up the infamous "4th and 26" play to the Eagles two years ago. He also said, after the Saints cut him, that he was "the second most talented player in the NFL after Randy Moss."
After two years of being unable to break the starting lineup in Green Bay, Hawthorne was cut this off-season by Green Bay.
The guy who blasted the Saints and the fans on his way out of New Orleans was Winfred Tubbs, but I can't find a link to his hilarity when he signed with Frisco in '98.
Kyle Turley got fed up with the Saints, surprisingly, after they told him that they weren't going to give into his insane contract demands (he wanted top dollar for a signing bonus when he had yet to actually make a pro bowl), continuing to blast the Saints for several months after signing with the Rams. He was quite happy with being a Ram, at first! And why not? It's not like he said the following in an interview with Dan Patrick or anything while still a Saint:
[quote]KT: My thing is this: If they were good all around, then I wouldn't have a problem with it. But that team stunk without Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk. If they didn't have Warner and Faulk, those guys, they would suck. They would suck, man ... and for all those other guys like London Fletcher and Dre' Bly to be talking so much smack about how good they are and this and that, it was ridiculous to me -- I mean, it was like being at San Diego State again. You'd have shootouts, you know. And to go against a team with no defense -- even last year, when they improved their defense, they still weren't that great. ... If they hadn't have talked so much, there wouldn't be a big deal. If they would just admit that the reason why they're so good is because of Warner and Faulk, then I'd be like, OK, that's cool. You guys are humble about being good, you know, and being fortunate enough to have those players on your team. Because without them, they would be nowhere.
DP: You probably have a problem with the guys who aren't the major stars, who do most of the talking, where Warner and Faulk don't say anything.
KT: Exactly. And that's my whole thing. I mean, Kurt Warner and Marshall Faulk carried that team on their shoulders, and the rest of those guys just rode their backs and jabbed their jaws the whole way through. And it was ridiculous to me. [/quote]
Annnnnnnnnd the most hilarious guy who thought that leaving the Saints meant he was "finally going to be able to play his game" was safety Michael Hawthorne.
You don't recognize the name? Well for starters he was the guy on the Packers who gave up the infamous "4th and 26" play to the Eagles two years ago. He also said, after the Saints cut him, that he was "the second most talented player in the NFL after Randy Moss."
After two years of being unable to break the starting lineup in Green Bay, Hawthorne was cut this off-season by Green Bay.