by Ice Cream Jonsey » Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:25 am
Bugs wrote:Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Yeah, I think I'll end up running a line from the computer/laptop to the TV if I go with MLB.tv. Which will look GREAT, all four pixels they give us will be sharp as hell.
Is it that bad? Because the demo looks OK, and they have that premium streaming video this season with 700k intstead of 400k or some such...
Well, let me ask you something, Bugs. Does the following look OK? Because this is a screen capture I did last year of an early game in the Blue Jays - Sox series.
Some people may be OK with that. For me, it was really an eyesore. I can't go back to that.
...
... OK, for real: yeah, I've heard that they have upgraded their stream or something. For me, it was never the bandwidth, it was the image quality. I rarely got hiccups: the picture just looked like shit. Not that I expect that any company run by Bud Selig to be on the cutting edge of techno-terms. Bud could have Extra Innings shot at 1280x1024 and tell us all that he gigafied the megs with three thousand extra Koala Pads.
Here's my problem: since Extra Innings was going to fucking charge me $14.95 a month (or whatever it was) throughout the entire off-season if I didn't call them up and complain, they are definitely, like prostitutes, in "one time charge" territory. But coming up with the whole amount locks me in for the season, and to be frank, the Jays sort of quit on that late west coast road trip. For years the fans and organization was all, "HOW HOWWWWW CAN WE SPEND LIKE NEW YORK AND BOSTON!?!!?" Well assholes, you lost out on the wild card spot to fucking Minnesota, a team that would be the Jolt Country Twins if we simply bothered to take up a collection. That infuriates me. I don't know how you get to be in second place and still be a bunch of quitters, but the 2006 team figured out how.
...
OK, I still haven't actually replied to you. Sorry. Yeah, if they upgrade their systems I'll bet that it's very watchable. It kind of sucked last year, but not because of the stream speeds, only because of the picture. Wouldn't surprise me if they addressed it. I'd say, "Go for it!" Ultimately, I'll probably convince myself to pay the one-time charge and get the season's worth of access.
Oh, they black out local games, so if a team moves to the Carolina market any time soon, yer fucked.
[quote="Bugs"][quote="Ice Cream Jonsey"]Yeah, I think I'll end up running a line from the computer/laptop to the TV if I go with MLB.tv. Which will look GREAT, all four pixels they give us will be sharp as hell.[/quote]
Is it that bad? Because the demo looks OK, and they have that premium streaming video this season with 700k intstead of 400k or some such...[/quote]
Well, let me ask you something, Bugs. Does the following look OK? Because this is a screen capture I did last year of an early game in the Blue Jays - Sox series.
[img]http://www.videogamecritic.net/images/2600/homerun.png[/img]
Some people may be OK with that. For me, it was really an eyesore. I can't go back to that.
...
... OK, for real: yeah, I've heard that they have upgraded their stream or something. For me, it was never the bandwidth, it was the image quality. I rarely got hiccups: the picture just looked like shit. Not that I expect that any company run by Bud Selig to be on the cutting edge of techno-terms. Bud could have Extra Innings shot at 1280x1024 and tell us all that he gigafied the megs with three thousand extra Koala Pads.
Here's my problem: since Extra Innings was going to fucking charge me $14.95 a month (or whatever it was) throughout the entire off-season if I didn't call them up and complain, they are definitely, like prostitutes, in "one time charge" territory. But coming up with the whole amount locks me in for the season, and to be frank, the Jays sort of quit on that late west coast road trip. For years the fans and organization was all, "HOW HOWWWWW CAN WE SPEND LIKE NEW YORK AND BOSTON!?!!?" Well assholes, you lost out on the wild card spot to fucking Minnesota, a team that would be the Jolt Country Twins if we simply bothered to take up a collection. That infuriates me. I don't know how you get to be in second place and still be a bunch of quitters, but the 2006 team figured out how.
...
OK, I still haven't actually replied to you. Sorry. Yeah, if they upgrade their systems I'll bet that it's very watchable. It kind of sucked last year, but not because of the stream speeds, only because of the picture. Wouldn't surprise me if they addressed it. I'd say, "Go for it!" Ultimately, I'll probably convince myself to pay the one-time charge and get the season's worth of access.
Oh, they black out local games, so if a team moves to the Carolina market any time soon, yer fucked.