TRAVESTY!

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:smile: :sad: :eek: :shock: :cool: :-x :razz: :oops: :evil: :twisted: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: TRAVESTY!

by LG » Mon Oct 27, 2003 8:54 pm

also game

by Slavering Clingy Guy » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:10 am

:oops: I dont even know who I am supposed to be! :oops:

by Slavering Creepy Guy » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:07 am

what other Corner

by Slobbering Creepy Guy » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:07 am

No, this corner is mine. MINE. You have the other corner.

by Slavering Creepy Guy » Wed Oct 22, 2003 10:06 am

Teufel ZeKK wrote:Vitriola wrote:
I'm sorry that my books were better than yours. I'm sorry your favorite authors when you were 15, and have so many fond memories of, do not go over well when the person you're trying to explain the "magic" to is 30.
I'm sorry, did you think I was refering to you? I guess you're right it could appear that this was directed at you, but sadly no, you're outright refusal to read through something due to it's lack of maturity wasn't what I was refering to.
not Bad. i would have put in a comment about attemppting to shoot her with an airsoft rifle somewhere But the important thing is you got the response Back.

p.s. i am working this corner Shove off

by Teufel ZeKK » Tue Oct 21, 2003 2:42 pm

Vitriola wrote:
I'm sorry that my books were better than yours. I'm sorry your favorite authors when you were 15, and have so many fond memories of, do not go over well when the person you're trying to explain the "magic" to is 30.
I'm sorry, did you think I was refering to you? I guess you're right it could appear that this was directed at you, but sadly no, you're outright refusal to read through something due to it's lack of maturity wasn't what I was refering to.

I've actually never had anyone (aside from my daughter's mom, who did like Eddings well enough we named our daughter after one of his characters (Insert patheticness here) ) like anything I recomended. So it wasn't something aimed at anyone in particular, just a broad generalization. Or a generalization about broads. I can never remember.

by Vitriola » Fri Oct 17, 2003 3:44 pm

In the last 25% of the book.

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Fri Oct 17, 2003 3:29 pm

bruce wrote:
Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Obviously, its title comes off as a play against the Necronomicon, so I thought it would be a book about the undead and puzzles. This is not what I got!
It's about puzzles.
And the undead?! WHERE'S THE UNDEAD, BRUEC?

by Roody_Yogurt » Fri Oct 17, 2003 3:15 pm

Eh, I think Bradbury's Martian stuff is fine.

by AArdvark » Fri Oct 17, 2003 3:08 pm

I can't remember if I like Anthony or not;
You don't , trust me.

Rather long winded at best. Stick to the authors that came up with the pulps and you can't go wrong. Asimov is good. Alan Dean Foster=better. Bradbury= better still (but forget about the Martian stuff)l


For sublime humor download the works of Booth Tarkington (he's out of print, public domain now, so breathe easy)


THE
RECCOMENDATIN'
AARDVARK

by Lysander » Fri Oct 17, 2003 7:33 am

Casual Observer wrote:You can sell almost anything to most people with enough epetition and hype.
Okay, true, I'll give you that one. But people should at *least* be able to recognize when what they are reading is crap and put it down, right?

by Lex » Fri Oct 17, 2003 3:30 am

I can't remember if I like Anthony or not; I'm an Asimov man, thru & thru.

by bruce » Thu Oct 16, 2003 8:39 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:Obviously, its title comes off as a play against the Necronomicon, so I thought it would be a book about the undead and puzzles. This is not what I got!
It's about puzzles.
ICJ wrote: Plus, all of Stephenson's other endings were shitty, I would be surprised if ole Crippy there didn't have one, too.
Yeah, well, uh, Quicksilver doesn't have a shitty ending but that's probably because it's the first third of the story.
RobB wrote: To everyone else: currently reading A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin, with the late as in the late Douglas Adams' A Salmon of Doubt to be queued up next. AGoT is solid, though I get the impression that sometimes the author strains a little bit to set the perfect medieval scene just as he would like it.
I'm hooked on the series now. I've read the first three (A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, and A Storm of Swords and I'm ashamed to say that I'm eagerly awaiting A Feast for Crows. The third one is much, much darker than the first two.

Bruce

by gsdgsd » Thu Oct 16, 2003 2:57 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote:To everyone else: currently reading A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin, with the late as in the late Douglas Adams' A Salmon of Doubt to be queued up next.
Fiction-wise, I just got through Stephenson's "Quicksilver", which was ok. Extremely well-written ok, but still just ok, and 900+ pages of ok to boot. Also finished Neal Pollack's "Never Mind the Pollacks" -- also ok. Bad month for highly-anticipated books by authors named Neal.

Next is probably Don Delillo's "Ratner's Star", which has been on my stack forever. And a whole lotta non-fiction.

Greg

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:38 pm

Vitriola wrote:I'm sorry Davoid Eddings sucks ass to anyone who has ever read a book written before 1900 and knows good characterization when they see it, and I'm sorry that's practically all you owned.
Eddings became my nemesis because back when George Alec Effinger was alive, I would always go to bookstores and follow the sci-fi / fantasy section alphabetically until I came to where GAE would be. He did not write a book for the longest time right up until he died, but fucking Eddings would always be there, churning out his work like his stuff would come out of a sentient butter press with a penchant for overcompensation.

I also hate Piers Anthony for the same reason (when Douglas Adams died).

(Kidding, I hate him because of his shitty puns. Kidding!)

(Not kidding.)

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:32 pm

Vitriola wrote:BTW, Robb couldn't get through Cryptonomicon, either :)
"Couldn't?" What's this "couldn't" shit? And for you to put a smiley there afterwards when you mean exactly the opposite ought to be a hanging crime should you ever enter the nation-state of Emoticonia.

"Couldn't." I was just happy I could lift it, first off, much less begin reading it. Anyway, Cryptonomicon is the classic book written by a guy who needed a goddamn editor to tell him to trim shit down, but didn't get one because nobody was going to mess with him because he was selling so well.

To be honest, I didn't like the book because the title was so good and had -- at least 3/4th of the way through -- nothing to really do with the story. Er, "stories," I guess, would be a better term. Obviously, its title comes off as a play against the Necronomicon, so I thought it would be a book about the undead and puzzles. This is not what I got!

(Truth to tell, I just wasn't that interested in the characters and was saving it for when I was flying next, which turned out to be a long time. The best character was Turing, and he wasn't even someone Stephenson had to go and make up. The comfort girl redhead there in the tower was pretty intriguing as well, but that's this whole other thread.)

Plus, all of Stephenson's other endings were shitty, I would be surprised if ole Crippy there didn't have one, too. So in a real way, getting 75% finished with it is sort of like finishing it, only without having to trudge through the (presumably) bad ending. I don't like to live my life counting the wins and losses, but by not finishing it there, I just TOTALLY WON.

To everyone else: currently reading A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin, with the late as in the late Douglas Adams' A Salmon of Doubt to be queued up next. AGoT is solid, though I get the impression that sometimes the author strains a little bit to set the perfect medieval scene just as he would like it. I don't really get the impression that Martin was from the 1300s or whatever, and it's nice to at least get a hint of that. (Plus, at least early on, there is a character named "Robb" who fucks shit up nicely. I have never read a book or seen a movie or played a game where there was a guy named "Robb" in it, so this must be what it is like for the rest of you to experience media. Hmm! Interesting!!)

by Casual Observer » Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:08 pm

Lysander not loggin' in wrote:To be fair, no one's exactly putting a gun to their head and forcing them to read it. . . .
True, nobody used a gun - only "$3 million to $4 million Scholastic spent on marketing blitz, up from $1 million for marketing the fourth book in the series"* This to me is similar to the hype and blitz the music industry gives to each passing "work for hire" pop star or madonna song.

You can sell almost anything to most people with enough repetition and hype.

* http://www.bizreport.com/article.php?art_id=4555[/i]

by bruce » Thu Oct 16, 2003 11:47 am

Lysander wrote:Fucking filastines...
"Philistines," Philistine.

Bruce

by Vitriola » Thu Oct 16, 2003 11:01 am

Teufel ZeKK wrote:Don't ask for recomendations though. I gave that up. Sick of reading what everyone else hands me to read but when the shoe's on the other foot, All I get is. "You have absolutly no taste because that book you gave me was so bad arf arf arf.
I'm sorry that my books were better than yours. I'm sorry your favorite authors when you were 15, and have so many fond memories of, do not go over well when the person you're trying to explain the "magic" to is 30. I'm sorry Davoid Eddings sucks ass to anyone who has ever read a book written before 1900 and knows good characterization when they see it, and I'm sorry that's practically all you owned. I'm terribly sorry you don't step foot in a library unless you need to use the internet, and that you never use said internet to get some actual good book rcommendations from authors whose target audiance isn't still getting their ass kicked by the cool kids in 9th grade. It's not like you liked all my recommendations either, but I'm not such a poncey wuss that I took it as an attack on my personality and couldn't get out of bed the next day.

BTW, Robb couldn't get through Cryptonomicon, either :)

by Casual Observer » Thu Oct 16, 2003 9:46 am

Lysander not loggin' in wrote:. . . I would appreciate a link to that, since I'm supposed to be studdying this very topic at this exact moment, yeah. Thanks much.
Article by Booker Prize-winning author A.S. Byatt
http://www.countercurrents.org/arts-byatt110703.htm

BBC article about same:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3055411.stm

Top