The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:smile: :sad: :eek: :shock: :cool: :-x :razz: :oops: :evil: :twisted: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :mrgreen:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by AArdvark » Sun Jul 02, 2023 10:55 am

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by AArdvark » Fri Dec 02, 2022 2:33 pm

Can we do this with Ed Wood movies?

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by pinback » Fri Dec 02, 2022 8:29 am

It was rigged and everyone knows it.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by AArdvark » Fri Dec 02, 2022 6:24 am

There's dinosaurs. Everyone loves dinosaurs. Mostly because they are extinct. If dinosaurs were around today eating everybody ( like sharks) people wouldn't like them half as much. Jaws is the better film.

I refuse to acknowledge the winner!


THE
ARIZONA
AARDVARK

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by pinback » Thu Dec 01, 2022 8:19 am

Jurassic Park won, 64%-36%. I assume this is just an age thing. On zero planets is Jurassic Park a better movie than Jaws.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Thu Dec 01, 2022 7:12 am

Fine. Keep your secrets.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Tdarcos » Thu Dec 01, 2022 6:42 am

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 6:56 pm No, I mean, didja see the movie Avatar?
Well, let's go back to what I said:
Tdarcos wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 2:32 am
Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:22 pm Avatar was terrible, however.

Tdarcos! Didja see Avatar?
Yeah,
I believe that a reasonable interpretation of that answer would be "yes."

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Wed Nov 30, 2022 6:56 pm

No, I mean, didja see the movie Avatar?

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Casual Observer » Wed Nov 30, 2022 6:00 pm

Tdarcos wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 2:32 am
Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:22 pm Avatar was terrible, however.

Tdarcos! Didja see Avatar?
Probable actual scenario: So, gas the residents and any foliage and strip mine the place. The natives try to uprise, saturation bomb the shit out of them. Which meant, in the real world, the movie lasts 15 minutes, with the Na'vi conveniently genocideed out of existence.
Brilliant take! Wanna do the same take with Shooter? It's ok, I will.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Tdarcos » Wed Nov 30, 2022 2:32 am

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:22 pm Avatar was terrible, however.

Tdarcos! Didja see Avatar?
Yeah, I also saw Cinema Sins "Everything Wrong With..." roast of the movie. I'm trying to remember what was the point of the movie. Extract metals from the planet. Fair enough. In the story: the Na'vi without powered weapons defeat and drive out the earth forces.

Probable actual scenario: So, gas the residents and any foliage and strip mine the place. The natives try to uprise, saturation bomb the shit out of them. Which meant, in the real world, the movie lasts 15 minutes, with the Na'vi conveniently genocideed out of existence.

Seriously, there is no way a pre-metals (or pre-gunpowder) civilization can defeat a fully technologically advanced civilization. In Star Trek: The Next Generation a human colony was on a planet and not noticed, but the planet was ceeded to Sheliak Corporate, who wants the planet for colonization, and the Enterprise needs to move all 15,000 colonist or the Sheliak will remove their corpses. They don't want to go, they can fight if necessary. Lt. Commander Data gives them a demonstration, by using a hand phaser he destroys the water supply, poining out that he is one android with a hand weapon, the Sheliak have much more powerful weapons and can use them from long distances. "You will be killed without ever seeing your killer's faces."

Short of the Na'vi busting into the Earth Forces HQ and capture the command officers, holding them as POWs until the other side sues for peace, I can't see them being able to beat earth military forces.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Casual Observer » Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:30 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:22 pm Avatar was terrible, however.

Tdarcos! Didja see Avatar?
The only thing Avatar added was motion capture which has brought CGI firmly in the uncanny valley

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:22 pm

Avatar was terrible, however.

Tdarcos! Didja see Avatar?

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Casual Observer » Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:39 pm

pinback wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:06 am
Casual Observer wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:43 pm Third Jurassic introduced Pterodactyls and the third Raiders was garbage so Jurrasic wins.
Last Crusade was "garbage", huh? A rare miss from CO.
Raiders had the good sense to stop at 3
Except for the fourth one, and the upcoming fifth one.

A rare miss from CO.
Image

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Casual Observer » Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:36 pm

pinback wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:35 am Jurassic Park's effects were better than Jaws'. If that's how you're judging movies, good luck to ya. Avatar was more groundbreaking than all of them put together, and it sucked pimply moose balls.
The first Avatar was fun, come on don't be such a relentless asshole.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Casual Observer » Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:35 pm

Ice Cream Jonsey wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:51 am CO, what did ya not like about Last Crusade? I'd rank them Raiders, Crusafe, Temple of Doom and then a giant distance and then the 4th one. I have generally not seen Last Crusade fail to "click" with people, so this could be an interesting discussion!
As much as I loved Sean Connery, they made it into a father/son "buddy flick". The banter was unbearable. The only thing I think I liked was imagining what it would be like to have been able to travel on a luxury zepplin, those days will never return. Christ, I never got to fly on a 747 before they were gone.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Casual Observer » Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:33 pm

pinback wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:06 am Except for the fourth one, and the upcoming fifth one.

A rare miss from CO.
Whoa those are things? Jesus christ. I don't even want to look at Harrison Ford anymore. Or his little boy wife either.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by pinback » Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:35 am

Jurassic Park's effects were better than Jaws'. If that's how you're judging movies, good luck to ya. Avatar was more groundbreaking than all of them put together, and it sucked pimply moose balls.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Tdarcos » Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:06 am

Even today, Jurassic Park's special effects look better than high-budget films made now.

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by Ice Cream Jonsey » Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:51 am

CO, what did ya not like about Last Crusade? I'd rank them Raiders, Crusafe, Temple of Doom and then a giant distance and then the 4th one. I have generally not seen Last Crusade fail to "click" with people, so this could be an interesting discussion!

Re: The Rotten Tomatoes Steven Spielberg Showdown

by pinback » Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:06 am

Casual Observer wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 10:43 pm Third Jurassic introduced Pterodactyls and the third Raiders was garbage so Jurrasic wins.
Last Crusade was "garbage", huh? A rare miss from CO.
Raiders had the good sense to stop at 3
Except for the fourth one, and the upcoming fifth one.

A rare miss from CO.

Top