Ban Runner

Video Game Discussions and general topics.

Moderators: AArdvark, Ice Cream Jonsey

User avatar
Billy Mays
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:33 am

Ban Runner

Post by Billy Mays »

I think we can all agree that it needs to be done.

Casual Observer
Posts: 3266
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 10:23 pm
Location: Everett, WA, 2 blocks from where the Green River Killer picked them up

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Casual Observer »

Nah, it's more therapeutic that we all abuse Paul while he fucks this shit up. Sorry for saying that Paul was getting funnier.

User avatar
AArdvark
Posts: 16178
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:12 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Re: Ban Runner

Post by AArdvark »

I'd really like to see a Runner video with Paul using a cat sock puppet, like Mister Rogers used to do.

User avatar
Flack
Posts: 8822
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:02 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Flack »

My personal theory is that Runner has been posting as Paul all along.
"I failed a savings throw and now I am back."

User avatar
Jizaboz
Posts: 4811
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:00 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Jizaboz »

Flack wrote: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:43 pm My personal theory is that Runner has been posting as Paul all along.
Same. Please do not ban either.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

User avatar
Tdarcos
Posts: 9333
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 9:25 am
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Tdarcos »

Flack wrote: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:43 pm My personal theory is that Runner has been posting as Paul all along.
Meow!

Curses! I've been discovered!
Alan Francis wrote a book containing everything men understand about women. It consisted of 100 blank pages.

User avatar
Billy Mays
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:33 am

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Billy Mays »

Wow, after seeing what's going on here a little more clearly I now realize that Paul uses the cat persona as a device to cope with the constant physical and psychological suffering he endures on a daily basis. My past naivete on the matter led me to a false conclusion that would have gotten his alt account banned had it not been for the wisdom of people like Flack, AArdvark, and Jizaboz.

Runner: I was wrong in what I did here, will you accept my apawlogy?

paul

Re: Ban Runner

Post by paul »

Billy Mays wrote: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:08 am Runner: I was wrong in what I did here, will you accept my apawlogy?
Meow!

I have learned not to be catty, I can be fur and reasonable. Besides, I doubt Jonsey would take the catastrophic step of banning this account when my paws stated what I was planning to do. It would be a very fishy thing to do.

User avatar
Ice Cream Jonsey
Posts: 28877
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Ice Cream Jonsey »

I mean, I'm all for keeping Runner and banning Paul if that's what you guys want.

Note to Paul Tdarcos, Baltimore, Maryland: nobody is going to ban you.
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!

User avatar
Ice Cream Jonsey
Posts: 28877
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Ice Cream Jonsey »

Update - I banned his 90 alts and his Tdarcos account. I'm not in the mood for someone who is wrong about everything to constantly lecture the rest of us.
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!

User avatar
RealNC
Posts: 2244
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:32 am

Re: Ban Runner

Post by RealNC »

You can't just ban people for being wrong.

User avatar
AArdvark
Posts: 16178
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 6:12 pm
Location: Rochester, NY

Re: Ban Runner

Post by AArdvark »

He suggested that Robb should shoot himself. That's bullying.

User avatar
pinback
Posts: 17672
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by pinback »

PAUL IF YOU CAN READ THIS, COME TO THE DISCORD!
I don't have to say anything. I'm a doctor, too.

User avatar
Billy Mays
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:33 am

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Billy Mays »

ICJ did the right thing here, Tdarcos went way over the line. My only concern is that did you take all of the steps to ensure that it was actually Tdarcos who made those nasty posts? Two things immediately stand out in my mind:

1. Tdarcos has been intentionally infecting his computer with malicious software while connected to the internet (caltrops).

2. "Tdarcos" got the detail regarding the shotgun and Hemingway's death correct. When has he ever gotten a detail correct? The Tdarcos I know would write an essay describing the "1911" that Hemingway shot himself with and just make up words for the parts of the gun he doesn't know the names for.

User avatar
Ice Cream Jonsey
Posts: 28877
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Ice Cream Jonsey »

You guys make some good points. I'll unban his Tdarcos account after today. I would like one day away from him.

However, his alternate accounts will remain banned because they are terrible and unfunny.

I don't care if he suggests I shoot myself. The reason he did that is because he didn't understand context.
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!

User avatar
Flack
Posts: 8822
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:02 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Flack »

I would like to request a new thread in which we list things Tdarcos doesn't understand.

I'll start: *.*
"I failed a savings throw and now I am back."

User avatar
Billy Mays
Posts: 2647
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 4:33 am

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Billy Mays »

ICJ did the right thing here, Tdarcos deserves another chance.

User avatar
Ice Cream Jonsey
Posts: 28877
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 2:44 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by Ice Cream Jonsey »

But isn't this better? Wasn't today a nice day on the forum?
the dark and gritty...Ice Cream Jonsey!

User avatar
pinback
Posts: 17672
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 3:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban Runner

Post by pinback »

Didn't care for it.
I don't have to say anything. I'm a doctor, too.

User avatar
RealNC
Posts: 2244
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:32 am

Re: Ban Runner

Post by RealNC »


Post Reply