But they are accurate wank rags

[quote=Flack post_id=100002 time=1549332656 user_id=840]The "reality of the situation" is that you said you "haven't been able to find any evidence for that narrative,"[/quote]

Your sources are wack, a string of rags that nobody reads and the janky side of espn.

Look, if Tony Romo says it, I believe it. Man that guy is great. (In the booth, I mean.)

[quote="Billy Mays" post_id=100000 time=1549328297 user_id=1042]
[quote=Flack post_id=99993 time=1549297799 user_id=840]You didn't try very hard. Google "worst super bowl ever" returns a lot of hits.[/quote]

You can throw in any number of random bits of crazy gibberish into google and have it return a lot of hits. The reality of the situation here is that even a cursory internet search finds the top commentators are agreeing with pinback's overall take on the game. Sure, if somebody wanted to criticize the game for having bad commercials or a terrible halftime show (things I believe ICJ was originally hinting at?) then I guess you could make that argument, but I thought this was a discussion on sports.
[/quote]

I didn't watch the game because who gives a shit about the Super Bowl when the wrong team is in there. But if you guys are HONESTLY telling us it was a glorious defensive battle, if you're reeeeeeeeeeeeeeally going to go that route then I suppose I have to defer because I was never watching that fucking abortion.

[quote=pinback post_id=99986 time=1549250734 user_id=5]
I feel like the Saints might have pushed them a little more.
[/quote]

I feel we could have hit four points. We have a great punter and defensive line.

[quote="Billy Mays" post_id=100000 time=1549328297 user_id=1042]
[quote=Flack post_id=99993 time=1549297799 user_id=840]You didn't try very hard. Google "worst super bowl ever" returns a lot of hits.[/quote]

You can throw in any number of random bits of crazy gibberish into google and have it return a lot of hits. The reality of the situation here is that even a cursory internet search finds the top commentators are agreeing with pinback's overall take on the game. Sure, if somebody wanted to criticize the game for having bad commercials or a terrible halftime show (things I believe ICJ was originally hinting at?) then I guess you could make that argument, but I thought this was a discussion on sports.
[/quote]

The "reality of the situation" is that you said you "haven't been able to find any evidence for that narrative," and I was pointing out that finding evidence for that narrative is pretty fucking easy to find since it's plastered all over the fucking internet.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/lessons-from-a-very-very-bad-super-bowl.html
http://www.startribune.com/lets-not-sugarcoat-it-the-super-bowl-was-awful/505307112/
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/lessons-from-a-very-very-bad-super-bowl.html
https://awfulannouncing.com/cbs/super-bowl-liii-draws-lowest-overnight-rating-for-a-super-bowl-since-2009.html
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2019/2/3/18209669/super-bowl-2019-results-reaction-patriots-rams
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/american-sports/worst-super-bowl-time-new-13949373
https://tvline.com/2019/02/03/super-bowl-liii-ratings-patriots-beat-rams-boring-game/
https://957thegame.radio.com/articles/jerry-rice-super-bowl-liii-was-some-worst-football-ever
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-04/ratings-worst-super-bowl-ever-hit-10-year-low
https://ew.com/tv/2019/02/03/super-bowl-liii-boring/
https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2019/2/3/18210025/los-angeles-rams-new-england-patriots-super-bowl-liii-johnny-hekker-ryan-allen-bill-belichick
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2019/02/04/tony-romo-troy-aikman-lebron-james-were-just-bored-by-super-bowl-liii-you-were/
https://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/for-petes-sake/article225485810.html
https://ftw.usatoday.com/2019/02/super-bowl-so-boring
https://abc13.com/sports/fans-and-astros-players-mock-boring-super-bowl-liii/5119723/
http://www.realclearlife.com/sports/super-bowl-liii-boring-sacked-nfls-image/
https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/ct-spt-super-bowl-ugly-boring-numbers-20190204-story.html
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/super-bowl-liii-had-the-lowest-ratings-in-10-years
https://fansided.com/2019/02/03/super-bowl-53-twitter-reaction-boring/
https://sportsday.dallasnews.com/dallas-cowboys/cowboys/2019/02/03/national-reaction-boring-fans-media-not-impressed-low-scoring-super-bowl-patriots-rams
https://chicago.suntimes.com/sports/super-bowl-liii-new-england-patriots-los-angeles-rams-punting-tom-brady-bill-belichick/
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/super-snore-bowl-twitter-users-think-so-n966441
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/03/sports/super-bowl-punts-defense.html
https://unpluggdwithngl.com/whats-up-ep-15-watching-paint-dry-ft-super-bowl-liii-dad869b9d33e
https://www.inquisitr.com/5280265/was-super-bowl-liii-the-most-boring-ever-the-internet-sure-seems-to-think-so/
http://espn1420.com/patriots-defeat-rams-in-awful-super-bowl-liii/

Thank you, Billy. Finally, a voice of reason around here.

[quote=Flack post_id=99993 time=1549297799 user_id=840]You didn't try very hard. Google "worst super bowl ever" returns a lot of hits.[/quote]

You can throw in any number of random bits of crazy gibberish into google and have it return a lot of hits. The reality of the situation here is that even a cursory internet search finds the top commentators are agreeing with pinback's overall take on the game. Sure, if somebody wanted to criticize the game for having bad commercials or a terrible halftime show (things I believe ICJ was originally hinting at?) then I guess you could make that argument, but I thought this was a discussion on sports.

[quote=pinback post_id=99995 time=1549301943 user_id=5]
Low score hockey games are often very exciting, sometimes even more exciting than a 6-5 turkey shoot. I felt the same way about this game. The defenses were EXCELLENT, not good, and to someone who appreciates the game and doesn't just hope the ball flies all over the field and everyone jumps up and down, it was a clinic.
[/quote]

I completely agree that low-score hockey games are usually great. World Cup games too. I just didn't get much enjoyment out of watching this football game after about the 1st quarter because the rest of the game just felt so repetitive.

Low score hockey games are often very exciting, sometimes even more exciting than a 6-5 turkey shoot. I felt the same way about this game. The defenses were EXCELLENT, not good, and to someone who appreciates the game and doesn't just hope the ball flies all over the field and everyone jumps up and down, it was a clinic.

What a waste of time watching that garbage was.

2nd gayest half-time show too. I'd say #1 but Lady Gaga did it one year.

How the hell could you enjoy this Pinback? More importantly, how could this even compare the the entertainment of a low-score hockey game?

[quote="Billy Mays" post_id=99991 time=1549287534 user_id=1042]
[quote="Ice Cream Jonsey" post_id=99988 time=1549255274 user_id=3]I'm glad the narrative is that the Super Bowl was terrible.[/quote]

I haven't been able to find any evidence for that narrative, do you have any sources to back up your claim?
[/quote]

You didn't try very hard. Google "worst super bowl ever" returns a lot of hits.

The worst Super Bowl ever
https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/04/opinions/super-bowl-pearlman/index.html

STEVE HARVEY BLASTS SUPER BOWL: 'Worst Game I've Ever Been To!'
https://www.tmz.com/2019/02/04/steve-harvey-super-bowl-liii-patriots-rams/

https://sports.yahoo.com/super-bowl-liii-complete-disaster-050153485.html

[quote="Ice Cream Jonsey" post_id=99988 time=1549255274 user_id=3]I'm glad the narrative is that the Super Bowl was terrible.[/quote]

I haven't been able to find any evidence for that narrative, do you have any sources to back up your claim?

I enjoyed the game. But I watch hockey where if it's 0-0 in the 3rd, it's usually been an exciting game. Last year's Super Bowl where everyone scored a hundred points every time they touched it, I felt like, anyone wanna play some defense or are we just going full carnival game with this one?

[quote="Ice Cream Jonsey" post_id=99970 time=1549148520 user_id=3]
Oh shit, he didn't! They usually put a guy in if a team is playing in the Super Bowl. Well, never mind.
[/quote]

Ty Law did go in for New England. So in some respects how I believe those mongrels think is still accurate.

So here's the problem when you fix this shit so the team you want makes it instead of the team that deserves it - sports in this day and age are pretty self-correcting. You fuck with that and you get a bullshit team that didn't belong taking up space. Three points. What a bunch of fucking losers. Three points!

I'm glad the narrative is that the Super Bowl was terrible. I'd argue that it's the same thing that happened with the DNC "deciding" it was Hillary's "turn." Instead of letting her try to beat Bernie properly, they decided ahead of time and she got her ass beat too. QUIT FUCKING WITH COMPETITION YOU ASSHOLES

To paraphrase one of my dad's sayings, "the Rams scored as many touchdowns in the Super Bowl as I did."

I feel like the Saints might have pushed them a little more.

Oh shit, he didn't! They usually put a guy in if a team is playing in the Super Bowl. Well, never mind.